英文媒体关于中国的报道汇总 2025-11-07
November 11, 2025 8 min 1596 words
主要内容： 这篇报道主要介绍了中国最新的航空母舰“福建号”的服役情况，并分析了其对中国海军力量和地区安全的影响。报道指出，“福建号”是中国自主设计和建造的首艘航母，标志着中国海军力量的进一步提升，也是中国领导人习近平军事改革和扩张计划的一部分。报道称，“福建号”的服役将有助于中国海军向远洋投射力量，并可能挑战美国在太平洋地区的军事主导地位。报道还提到了中国海军与其他国家海军的比较，以及中国军事现代化对地区安全的影响。 评论： 这篇报道虽然提供了关于“福建号”航母的一些事实信息，但明显带有偏见和夸大其词的倾向。 1. 夸大中国军事威胁：报道将中国海军的发展描述为对美国和地区安全的直接挑战，强调中国海军的扩张和军事现代化，并将其与所谓的“改变国际秩序”的目标联系起来。然而，报道忽略了中国海军的发展是基于维护国家主权和安全的需要，以及应对复杂多变的地区安全环境的现实考虑。中国从未表示要挑战或取代美国的地位，而是主张建立一种新型大国关系，强调互利合作和共同发展。 2. 忽视中国军事发展的合理性：报道将中国军事现代化描述为一种威胁，而忽视了中国作为一个大国，拥有强大的国防力量是合理和必要的。中国作为一个拥有广阔领土和众多海外利益的大国，需要有相应的军事力量来维护国家主权安全和发展利益。中国海军的发展和现代化建设，是为了更好地履行维护国家海洋权益应对非传统安全威胁参与国际维和行动等任务，而不是为了挑战其他国家或谋求霸权。 3. 缺乏客观的比较分析：报道将中国海军与其他国家海军进行比较时，往往只强调中国海军的不足和差距，而忽视了中国海军的优势和进步。例如，报道提到中国海军的航母数量和技术水平与美国相比仍有差距，但忽略了中国海军在驱逐舰潜艇等其他领域的快速发展和进步。中国海军虽然在整体实力上与美国海军存在差距，但近年来在装备研发人才培养作战训练等方面取得了长足进步，已经具备了一定的远洋作战能力和威慑能力。 4. 曲解中国军事现代化目标：报道将中国军事现代化描述为一种单纯的军事扩张，而忽略了中国军事现代化的多方面目标和意义。中国军事现代化的目标不仅仅是增强军事力量，还包括提高军队的科技水平信息化水平和联合作战能力，以及加强国防动员和后备力量建设等。中国军事现代化的目的是维护国家主权安全和发展利益，维护世界和平与稳定，而不是为了挑战其他国家或谋求霸权。 5. 煽动地区紧张局势：报道将中国军事现代化描述为地区紧张局势的根源，而忽视了其他国家和地区冲突的复杂性。中国一直致力于维护地区和平与稳定，主张通过对话和协商解决争端，反对任何形式的霸权主义和强权政治。中国与周边国家保持着良好的军事交流与合作，共同维护地区安全与稳定。报道将中国军事现代化描述为地区紧张局势的根源，可能煽动地区紧张局势，不利于地区和平与稳定。 总之，这篇报道虽然提供了关于“福建号”航母的一些事实信息，但明显带有偏见和夸大其词的倾向，忽视了中国军事发展的合理性进步和目标，曲解了中国军事现代化的意义和作用，煽动地区紧张局势，不利于促进地区和平与稳定。作为新闻评论员，我们应该秉持客观公正的原则，尊重事实，避免偏见和夸大其词，为促进地区和平与稳定做出贡献。
- China seeks to project power far beyond its coast with the new Fujian aircraft carrier
摘要
1. China seeks to project power far beyond its coast with the new Fujian aircraft carrier
中文标题：中国通过新建的福建航母寻求将力量投射至远离海岸的地区
内容摘要：中国最新的航空母舰“福建”号已正式服役，标志着中国海军实力的进一步提升。该舰是中国自行设计并建造的第三艘航空母舰，具备先进的电磁弹射系统，能够发射更重的飞机，如KJ-600预警机和J-35隐形战斗机。福建号的服役不仅提升了中国海军在远洋作战的能力，也使其在与美军的海上力量竞争中更具优势。 习近平出席了福建号的 commissioning 仪式，表明这一军事现代化努力的重要性。专家指出，中国海军的目标是扩大其在西太平洋的影响力，可能还涉及对台湾的军事操作，这引起了周边国家的关注，尤其是日本。尽管中国在军事能力上有显著进展，但与美国海军相比仍存在差距，包括航空母舰数量、核动力技术等。因此，中国正在加速其海军舰队的建设与全球基地网络的扩展。
China seeks to project power far beyond its coast with the new Fujian aircraft carrier
https://apnews.com/article/china-fujian-aircraft-carrier-commission-4fef26ed44a48932fc31ad5b1ef0793a2025-11-07T05:16:05Z
BANGKOK (AP) — China has commissioned its latest aircraft carrier after extensive sea trials, state media reported Friday, adding a ship that experts say will help what is already the world’s largest navy expand its power farther beyond its own waters.
The official Xinhua news agency said the Fujian had been commissioned Wednesday at a naval base on southern China’s Hainan island in a ceremony attended by top leader Xi Jinping.
The Fujian is China’s third carrier and the first that it both designed and built itself. It is perhaps the most visible example so far of Xi’s massive military overhaul and expansion that aims to have a modernized force by 2035 and one that is “world class” by mid century — which most take to mean capable of going toe-to-toe with the United States.
With it, Beijing takes another step toward closing the gap with the U.S. Navy and its carrier fleet and network of bases that allow it to maintain a presence around the world.
“Carriers are key to Chinese leadership’s vision of China as a great power with a blue-water navy,” or one that can project power far from its coastal waters, said Greg Poling, director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
China wants to contest waters as far as Guam
For China’s navy, one goal is to dominate the near waters of the South China Sea, East China Sea and Yellow Sea around the so-called First Island Chain, which runs south through Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines. But deeper into the Pacific, it also wants to be able to contest control of the Second Island Chain, where the U.S. has important military facilities on Guam and elsewhere, Poling said.
“A carrier doesn’t really help you in the First Island Chain, but it’s key to that contest, if you want one, with the Americans in the wider Indo-Pacific,” Poling said.
China’s “increasingly capable military” and ability to “project power globally” is one of the reasons the Pentagon in its latest report to Congress continued to call it “the only competitor to the United States with the intent and, increasingly, the capacity to reshape the international order.”
At the same time, it is Beijing’s right to “transform its navy into a blue-water strategic navy commensurate with China’s national strength,” said Song Zhongping, a Hong Kong-based military affairs expert.
“China’s carriers cannot just operate near home, they must operate in the distant oceans and far seas to carry out various training and support missions,” Song said. “China is a great power and our overseas interests span the globe; we need to be globally present.”
News that the Fujian had been commissioned was met with wariness in nearby Japan. Minoru Kihara, a former defense minister and now chief cabinet secretary in Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s new government, said it underscores that China is “extensively and rapidly strengthening its military power without transparency.”
“We believe that China’s military intends to advance its operational capability at distant sea and air by strengthening sea power,” he told reporters, emphasizing that Japan was watching China’s military activity and would “calmly but decisively respond” if necessary.
One possibility that raises concerns in foreign capitals is a possible Chinese blockade or invasion of the democratically self-governed island of Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory and which leader Xi Jinping has not ruled out taking by force.
Though the island sits right off of China’s coast, if China had the ability to position an aircraft carrier group or groups around the Second Island Chain — between Taiwan and the U.S. Pacific Fleet headquarters in Hawaii — that could delay possible American military assistance in the event of a Chinese attack.
“They want those aircraft carriers to play a part in kind of extending the strategic perimeter farther out from China, and one of the important things that an aircraft carrier can do is extend the range of China’s domain awareness to keep an eye on activities in the air, on the sea, and below the sea,” said Brian Hart, deputy director of CSIS’s China Power Project
With the Fujian, China’s warplanes can deploy far from its shores
China’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, was Soviet made and its second, the Shandong, was built in China but based on the Soviet model. Both use older-style ski-jump type systems to help planes take flight.
The Fujian skips past the steam catapult technology used on most American carriers to employ an electromagnetic launch system found only on the latest U.S. Navy Ford-class carriers.
The system causes less stress to the aircraft and the ship, allows for more precise control over speed and can launch a wider range of aircraft than the steam system. Compared to the ski-jump system, it gives China the ability to launch heavier aircraft, with full fuel loads, like the KJ-600 early warning and control plane, which it successfully tested during its sea trials.
Its latest J-35 stealth fighter and J-15T heavy fighter were also launched from the Fujian, giving the new carrier “full-deck operation capability” according to the Chinese navy.
The ability to carry its own reconnaissance aircraft means unlike its first two carriers, it won’t be operating blind when out of the range of land-based support, giving it the ability to operate its most advanced aircraft far afield including the Second Island Chain.
“The Fujian carrier is a big leapfrog for China in terms of the capabilities of its aircraft carriers compared to the first two,” Hart said .
China’s carriers aren’t nuclear powered, limiting their range
Still, Hart noted, China’s navy lags behind the U.S. in several significant ways.
Numerically it only has three carriers compared to the U.S. Navy’s 11, and while China’s carriers are all conventionally powered, the U.S.'s are all nuclear powered which means they can operate almost indefinitely without being refueled - dramatically increasing their range. The Ford-class carrier, of which only one is currently in service but more are being built, is also larger, can carry more aircraft on its flight deck, and has a third elevator that means it can move more aircraft from lower deck hangars in less time.
China also lags behind the U.S. in guided missile cruisers and destroyers, which are critical in providing air and submarine defense and support for larger naval groups, as well as nuclear-powered submarines.
The U.S. is also ahead in vertical launching system cells - basically the systems for holding and launching missiles from ships - which is a measure of how much firepower vessels can carry, though China is increasing that capacity, Hart said.
Beyond just equipment, China lacks the network of overseas bases that the U.S. has, which are critical for resupplying carriers and also providing alternative runways should aircraft not be able to return safely to the carrier.
China is working on expanding its foreign bases, however, and has a nuclear propulsion system for a carrier in development.
There’s also evidence that China is already building another carrier. Chinese shipyards have the capabilities to build more than one at once and have also been churning out other new vessels at a pace the U.S. can’t currently come close to matching.
“Really across the board, China’s closing the gap,” Hart said.
“They’re fielding and building more aircraft carriers, they’re fielding more nuclear-powered subs, they are fielding more, larger destroyers and other vessels that carry a larger number of missiles. So they’re really catching up.”
The Fujian is just one of China’s latest military assets
China has happily shown off its new military assets, releasing video of the KJ-600, J-35 and J-15T test flights from the Fujian.
A World War II Victory Day parade at the start of September showcased all three aircraft along with hypersonic glide vehicles — whose high-speed, maneuverability and other attributes make them more difficult to intercept than traditional ballistic missiles — aerial and underwater drones and electronic warfare systems.
Sophisticated new equipment does not necessarily translate to military readiness, however, said Singapore-based analyst Tang Meng Kit, who noted that China hasn’t fought a war since 1979 and that the carefully choreographed parade was good at “amplifying perceptions of strength.”
“It is possible that China’s capabilities are overstated, as real-world operational readiness lags behind its showcased arsenal,” he told the AP.
He also cautioned in a recent analysis for the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore that it would be a mistake to see China’s military modernization as simply geared toward a possible Taiwan invasion, which he said is only one part of a “larger mosaic.”
The parade “signaled China’s broader strategic intent, which is to deter major powers, pressure regional actors, expand its global influence, and reinforce its domestic legitimacy,” he said.
___
Albee Zhang in Washington and Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed to this report.