英文媒体关于中国的报道汇总 2025-10-14
October 18, 2025 12 min 2484 words
随手搬运西方主流媒体的所谓的民主自由的报道，让帝国主义的丑恶嘴脸无处遁形。
- Renewed jitters over China-US trade tensions pull Wall Street lower in premarket trading
- China sanctions 5 US units of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean over probe by Washington
- China and the US have long collaborated in ‘open research.’ Some in Congress say that must change
摘要
1. Renewed jitters over China-US trade tensions pull Wall Street lower in premarket trading
中文标题：因对中美贸易紧张局势的担忧加剧，华尔街在盘前交易中下滑
内容摘要：美国股市在周二开盘前因中国对五家韩国造船公司子公司实施制裁而大幅下跌。此举加剧了与美国的贸易紧张关系，导致标准普尔500指数期货跌幅达1%，道琼斯工业平均指数期货跌幅为0.6%。中国商务部宣布禁止中企与南韩汉华海洋公司旗下子公司的交易，此举意在回应特朗普总统努力重建美国造船业的行动。 与此同时，国际航运和造船行业成为中美之间的主要摩擦源之一，双方相互对对方的船只征收新港口费用。尽管特朗普此前表示不必担忧中国，但他的言论在上周曾引发市场大跌。交易员们还在等待美联储主席鲍威尔的讲话，并关注美国大银行的财报表现。在其它市场方面，日本日经225指数下跌2.6%，全球范围内的市场普遍受到影响。
2. China sanctions 5 US units of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean over probe by Washington
中文标题：中国因华盛顿的调查对韩国船舶制造商韩华海洋的五个美国单位实施制裁
内容摘要：中国商务部最近禁止中国企业与韩国造船企业Hanwha Ocean的五个子公司进行交易，此举被视为对美国总统特朗普重建美国造船业努力的反击。该部门还表示正在调查美国针对中国造船业主导地位的调查，威胁采取更大报复措施。美国在2024年发起了对中国造船业的301条款贸易调查，认为其对美国企业构成负担。 与此同时，韩国与美国在造船领域加强合作，以应对中国在全球造船业的主导地位。Hanwha Ocean于2024年底收购了美国费城造船厂，并计划投资50亿美元以支持美国的造船能力。 Hanwha Ocean的股票在中国的制裁消息后下跌，韩国外交部正在评估制裁可能对相关行业的影响。中美两国在造船和国际航运领域的摩擦加剧，互相对对方的船只实施新的港口费用，引发新的贸易紧张。
3. China and the US have long collaborated in ‘open research.’ Some in Congress say that must change
中文标题：中国与美国长期以来在“开放研究”方面展开合作。国会中的一些人表示，这种状况必须改变。
内容摘要：美国与中国的学术合作曾经是开放和共享知识的典范，但最近美国立法者对这种合作感到担忧，认为中国可能利用开放研究来加速军事技术的发展、威胁美国国家安全。阿肯色州共和党参议员汤姆·科顿提议对与中国军事相关机构的研究合作实施新限制。随着中美两国经济和关系的逐渐恶化，国会对中方利用美国高等教育资源的行为表示严厉关注。多个政府报告指出，中国军事研究者与美国高校的合作可能助长非法知识转移和军事现代化，同时提出更严格的签证政策和限制学术合作的建议。尽管一些学者警告这种限制可能适得其反，阻碍科研进展，但国会仍在积极推动保护美国研究的立法。
Renewed jitters over China-US trade tensions pull Wall Street lower in premarket trading
https://apnews.com/article/stock-markets-trump-china-earnings-dc8d57baf625c9da5766345fb092d02d2025-10-14T04:05:25Z
U.S. markets slumped early Tuesday after Chinese sanctions against the U.S. subsidiaries of a major South Korean shipbuilder shook a fragile sense of calm over trade tensions with Washington.
Futures for the S&P 500 lost 1% before the opening bell, while futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average slid 0.6%. Nasdaq futures tumbled 1.3% as a broad of swath of technology companies saw their shares slide.
China’s Commerce Ministry said Tuesday it was banning dealings by Chinese companies with five subsidiaries of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean, swiping at President Donald Trump’s efforts to rebuild the industry in America.
“China just weaponized shipbuilding,” said Kun Cao, deputy chief executive at consulting firm Reddal. “Beijing is signaling it will hit third-country firms that help Washington counter China’s maritime dominance.”
South Korea and the U.S. have been building closer ties in shipbuilding in response to China’s dominance as the world’s largest shipbuilder. Hanwha acquired the Philly Shipyard in Pennsylvania last year and has contracts with the U.S. Navy to perform maintenance, repair and overhaul work for U.S. naval vessels.
Hanwha Ocean’s shares fell 5.8% in Seoul on Tuesday and the benchmark Kospi lost 0.6% to 3,561.81.
◆ Stay up to date with similar stories by signing up to our WhatsApp channel.
International shipping and shipbuilding have become a major source of friction between Washington and Beijing, with each side imposing new port fees on each others’ vessels. Those fees went into effect on Tuesday.
Markets had calmed Monday after Trump wrote on his Truth Social media platform Sunday, “Don’t worry about China. ″ On Friday, Trump helped spur a sell-off after he threatened to hike tariffs on China by 100% in reaction to Beijing’s latest controls on exports of rare earths.
While waiting for Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to speak later Tuesday, investors are taking in a slew of corporate earnings reports, most significantly big U.S. banks.
JPMorgan Chase shares inched down 0.7% after the U.S. investment bank breezed past Wall Street’s sales and profit expectations for the seventh straight quarter. JPMorgan said its results benefited from record third-quarter markets revenue and increased merger and acquisition activity.
Wells Fargo also easily beat analysts’ targets in the July-September period and its shares rose 2.8% in premarket. Wells CEO Charlie Scharf highlighted growth in net interest income and growth in fee income in both its consumer and commercial banking business.
Domino’s jumped 3.5% after the pizza delivery giant beat analysts’ third-quarter sales and profit targets. The company highlighted several promotions that helped boost U.S. same-store sales growth by 5.2%.
Elsewhere, in Europe at midday, France’s CAC 40 declined 1.1%, while the German DAX lost 1.4%. Britain’s FTSE 100 shed 0.3%.
During Tuesday trading, Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 dropped 2.6% to finish at 46,847.32. The slide reversed a rally last week in Tokyo after conservative lawmaker Sanae Takaichi was chosen to lead the country’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party.
The subsequent collapse of the LDP’s 26-year-old coalition with the Buddhist-backed Komeito has cast doubt over whether Takaichi will become Japan’s first female prime minister and added to political uncertainty.
The renewed sense of unease over the state of China-U.S. trade tensions pulled benchmarks in Hong Kong and Shanghai lower.
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng lost 1.7% to 25,441.35, while the Shanghai Composite shed 0.6% to 3,865.23.
Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 rose nearly 0.2% to 8,899.40.
In energy trading, benchmark U.S. crude lost $1.36, about 2.3%, to $58.13 a barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, fell $1.37 to $61.93 a barrel.
China sanctions 5 US units of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean over probe by Washington
https://apnews.com/article/china-us-hanwha-shipbuilding-korea-trade-cb72348bb00cb95801c2d6b5a47702fa2025-10-14T05:32:46Z
HONG KONG (AP) — China’s Commerce Ministry said Tuesday it was banning dealings by Chinese companies with five subsidiaries of South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean in the latest swipe by Beijing at U.S. President Donald Trump’s effort to rebuild the industry in America.
The ministry also announced that it was investigating a probe by Washington into China’s growing dominance in world shipbuilding, and threatened more retaliatory measures. It said the U.S. probe endangers China’s national security and its shipping industry and cited Hanwha’s involvement in the investigation.
The U.S. Trade Representative launched the Section 301 trade investigation in April 2024. It determined that China’s strength in the industry was a burden to U.S. businesses.
“China just weaponized shipbuilding,” said Kun Cao, deputy chief executive at consulting firm Reddal. “Beijing is signaling it will hit third-country firms that help Washington counter China’s maritime dominance.”
International shipping and shipbuilding have yet another areas of friction between Washington and Beijing. Each side has imposed new port fees on each others’ vessels that took effect on Tuesday.
South Korea and the U.S. have been building closer ties in shipbuilding in response to China’s dominance as the world’s largest shipbuilder.
◆ Stay up to date with similar stories by signing up to our WhatsApp channel.
In late 2024, Hanwha Ocean acquired the Philly Shipyard in Pennsylvania for $100 million. It announced in August that it plans to invest $5 billion in new docks and quays as part of its support for U.S. efforts to restore globally competitive shipbuilding capacity.
Last year, Hanwha Ocean secured contracts with the U.S. Navy to perform maintenance, repair and overhaul work for U.S. naval vessels.
The company said via email that “Hanwha Ocean is aware of the announcement made by the Chinese government and is closely reviewing its potential business impact on the company.”
Hanwha Ocean’s shares traded in South Korea fell as much as over 8% on Tuesday, closing 5.8% lower.
In a statement to The Associated Press, South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said the Seoul government was assessing how the sanctions might affect the Hanwha companies and related South Korean industrial sectors.
The ministry said it will “communicate with relevant ministries, industry representatives and the Chinese side to minimize damages resulting from these measures.”
The sanctioned entities are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard Inc., Hanwha Ocean USA International LLC, Hanwha Shipping Holdings LLC and HS USA Holdings Corp.
A truce in the trade war between the world’s two biggest economies appears to have unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened a new 100% tariff on imports from China, expressing frustration over new Chinese export controls on rare earths.
The escalation of antagonisms raised doubts over whether Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will go ahead with a meeting planned for late this month. But Beijing said on Tuesday that China and the U.S. held working-level talks on Monday and have maintained communication.
China said its new port fees would apply to ships owned by U.S. companies or other entities or individuals, those operated by U.S. entities including those having a U.S. stake of 25% or more, vessels flying a U.S. flag and vessels built in the United States, mirroring in many aspects the U.S.’s port fees on Chinese ships.
U.S. businesses represents just 2.9% of world fleet ownership by capacity and 0.1% of global shipbuilding tonnage. Trump has vowed to help rebuild the industry as part of his broader push to expand U.S.-based manufacturing.
China accounts for more than half of all new shipbuilding, with South Korea at about 30% and Japan just over a tenth of the total.
Hanwha Ocean said in May that it was withdrawing from a joint venture in China.
China and the US have long collaborated in ‘open research.’ Some in Congress say that must change
https://apnews.com/article/united-states-china-academic-research-congress-53ee311ea07f6ceccee4a7fe99f0857d2025-10-14T01:01:07Z
WASHINGTON (AP) — For many years, American and Chinese scholars worked shoulder to shoulder on cutting-edge technologies through open research, where findings are freely shared and accessible to all. But that openness, a long-standing practice celebrated for advancing knowledge, is raising alarms among some U.S. lawmakers.
They are worried that China — now considered the most formidable challenger to American military dominance — is taking advantage of open research to catch up with the U.S. on military technology and even gain an edge. And they are calling for action.
“For far too long, our adversaries have exploited American colleges and universities to advance their interests, while risking our national security and innovation,” said Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican and chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. He has introduced legislation to put new restrictions on federally funded research collaboration with academics at several Chinese institutions that work with the Chinese military, as well as institutions in other countries deemed adversarial to U.S. interests.
The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party makes it a priority to protect American research, having accused Beijing of weaponizing open research by converting it into a “pipeline of foreign talent and military modernization.”
The rising concerns on Capitol Hill threaten to unravel deep, two-generations-old academic ties between the countries even as the world’s two largest economies are moving away from each other through tariffs and trade barriers. The relationship has shifted from engagement to competition, if not outright enmity.
◆ Stay up to date with similar stories by signing up to our WhatsApp channel.
“Foreign adversaries are increasingly exploiting the open and collaborative environment of U.S. academic institutions for their own gain,” said James Cangialosi, director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, which in August issued a bulletin urging universities to do more to protect research from foreign meddling.
The House committee released three reports in September alone. They targeted, respectively, Pentagon-funded research involving military-linked Chinese scholars; joint U.S.-China institutes that train STEM talent for China; and visa policies that have brought military-linked Chinese students to Ph.D. programs at American universities. The reports recommend more legislation to protect U.S. research, tighter visa policies to vet Chinese students and scholars and an end to academic partnerships that could be exploited to boost China’s military powers.
Deep ties between Chinese and US research
More than 500 U.S. universities and institutes have collaborated with Chinese military researchers in recent years, helping Beijing develop advanced technologies with military applications, such as anti-jamming communications and hypersonic vehicles, according to a report by the private U.S. intelligence group Strider Technologies.
Despite efforts in recent years by the U.S. government to set up guardrails to prevent such collaboration from boosting China’s military capabilities, the practice is still prevalent, according to Strider, based in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The report identified nearly 2,500 publications produced in collaboration between U.S. entities and Chinese military-affiliated research institutes in 2024 on STEM research, which includes physics, engineering, material science, computer science, biology, medicine and geology. While the number peaked at more than 3,500 in 2019, before some new restrictive measures came into effect, the level of collaboration remains high, the report said.
This collaboration not only facilitates “potential illicit knowledge transfer,” but supports China’s “state-directed efforts to recruit top international talent, often to the detriment of U.S. national interests,” the report said.
Foreign countries can exploit American research by stealing secrets for use in military and commercial settings, by poaching talented researchers for foreign companies and universities and by recruiting students and researchers as potential spies, authorities say.
Fostering a climate of robust academic research takes funding and long-term support. Stealing the fruits of that labor, however, can be as easy as hacking into a university network, hiring away researchers or coopting the research itself. That’s why, authorities say, it’s so tempting for American adversaries looking to take advantage of U.S. institutions and research.
The most recent threat assessment report from the Department of Homeland Security highlights concerns that American adversaries — and China specifically — seek to illicitly acquire U.S. technology. Authorities say China aims to steal military and computing technology that might give the U.S. an advantage, as well as the latest commercial innovations.
Industry seeks a balance
Abigail Coplin, assistant professor of sociology and science, technology and society at Vassar College, said there are already guardrails for federally funded research to protect classified information and anything deemed sensitive.
She also said open research goes both ways, benefiting the U.S. as well, and restrictions could be counterproductive by driving away talents.
“American national security interests and economic competitiveness would be better served by continuing — if not increasing — research funding than they are by implementing costly research restrictions,” Coplin said.
Arnie Bellini, a tech entrepreneur and investor, also said efforts to protect U.S. research risk stifling progress if they go too far and prevent U.S. colleges or startups from sharing information about new and emerging technology. Keeping up with China will also require big investments in efforts to protect innovation, said Bellini, who recently donated $40 million to establish a new cybersecurity and AI research college at the University of South Florida.
Bellini said it’s imperative to encourage research and development without giving secrets away to America’s enemies. “In the U.S., it is a reality now that our digital borders are under siege — and businesses of every size are right to be concerned,” Bellini said.
According to Department of Justice figures, about 80% of all economic espionage cases prosecuted in the U.S. involve alleged acts that would benefit China.
Some members of Congress have pushed to reinstate a Department of Justice program created during the first Trump administration that sought to investigate Chinese intellectual espionage. The so-called “ ChinaInitiative ” ended in 2022 after critics said it failed to address the problem even as it perpetrated racist stereotypes about Asian American academics.